• Broussard Avila posted an update 4 months ago

    file down site
    Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud must be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn’t enough to stream.

    Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

    Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

    Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

    File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).


    It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

    In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

    When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.

    You must share a URL and that means you can’t share music files or videos.

    According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It’s much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

    It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let’s assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it’s often take off at that point)

    It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

    You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

    Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it’s in that state, you have to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

    The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you’ll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

    Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

    Google Drive

    It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

    It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

    It is easy to connect with other Google services such as Gmail.

    If you don’t upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

    Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn’t bother me.
    There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It’s a tiny problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.

    Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

    There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn’t stipulated by company policy.

    If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it’s the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

    Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)


    It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

    There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.

    The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.

    The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

    The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It’s practically infinite unless you’re going to share large files.

    The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

    Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…

    There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.

    Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.

    The dropbox itself can’t be documented.

    There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

    In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
    File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

    Slow. Not paid people.

    Media access is quite disadvantageous. It’s even worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.

    The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

    In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

    Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it’s significantly less than Google Drive).

    It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a little slow.***


    The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

    The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it’s not that strong a difference.

    It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.